江苏卫生健康事业高质量发展评价指标体系研究

侯静静, 苏丽丽, 黄晓光

卫生软科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2) : 36-40.

PDF(4698 KB)
PDF(4698 KB)
卫生软科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2) : 36-40. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2800.2021.02.009
软科学研究

江苏卫生健康事业高质量发展评价指标体系研究

  • 侯静静, 苏丽丽, 黄晓光
作者信息 +

Study on high-quality development evaluation index system of health services in Jiangsu

  • HOU Jing-jing, SU Li-li, HUANG Xiao-guang
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

[目的] 构建科学合理、可操作性强的江苏卫生健康事业高质量发展评价指标体系,为区域内卫生健康高质量发展的评估提供参考依据。[方法] 采用德尔菲法,经过2轮专家咨询确定指标体系,运用层次分析法确定各级指标权重值。[结果] 经两轮专家咨询得到的专家积极系数为93.75%和100%,专家权威系数0.86,专家意见协调系数重要性、可操作性和敏感性分别为0.222、0.271、0.316,指标权重打分协调系数为0.526,均有统计学意义(P<0.05),专家意见趋于一致。最终构建了由3个一级指标、11个二级指标和44个三级指标构成的江苏卫生健康事业高质量发展评价指标体系,3个一级指标(卫生健康发展结构、过程、结果)权重分别为0.3419、0.3099和0.3482。[结论] 该指标体系构建具有较好的理论基础,专家咨询可靠性较好,最终指标体系科学合理,可为评估实践提供参考依据。

Abstract

Objective To build scientific and operational high-quality development evaluation index system of health services in Jiangsu Province so as to provide reference for the evaluation of high-quality development of health in regions. Methods It used Delphi method to determine index system through two rounds expert consultation, and determined index weight value at different levels by AHP. Results Expert positive coefficient after two rounds expert consultation was 93.75% and 100% respectively, and expert authority coefficient was 0.86, importance, operability and sensitivity of expert opinion coordination coefficient was 0.222, 0.271 and 0.316 respectively, cooperation coefficient of index weight was 0.526, all above had statistical significance (P<0.05), expert opinions tended to accordance. At last, high-quality development evaluation index system of health services in Jiangsu Province was constituted by 3 first-level indicators, 11 second-level indicators and 44 third-level indicators, the weight of first- level indicators (structure, process and result of health development) was 0.3419, 0.3099 and 0.3482 respectively. Conclusions The establishment of index system has better theoretical basis, better reliability of expert consultation, final index system is scientific and reasonable so as to provide reference for evaluation and practice.

关键词

卫生健康事业 / 高质量发展 / 指标体系

Key words

health services / high-quality development / index system

引用本文

导出引用
侯静静, 苏丽丽, 黄晓光. 江苏卫生健康事业高质量发展评价指标体系研究[J]. 卫生软科学, 2021, 35(2): 36-40 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-2800.2021.02.009
HOU Jing-jing, SU Li-li, HUANG Xiao-guang. Study on high-quality development evaluation index system of health services in Jiangsu[J]. Soft Science of Health, 2021, 35(2): 36-40 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-2800.2021.02.009

参考文献

[1] 贾孝敏. 习近平关于人民健康重要论述的核心内涵、理论特征与时代价值[J].学校党建与思想教育,2020,(14):4-6.
[2] 曾光,李辉.现代流行病学方法与应用[M].北京:北京医科大学,中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1996.
[3] 李祚泳. 层次分析法及其研究进展[J].自然杂志,1991,(12):904-907.
[4] 郝模. 卫生政策学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005,7(1): 262-266.
[5] 曹红梅,胡红岩,顾海,等.结构—过程—结果视角下的远程医疗服务质量评价[J].卫生经济研究,2019,36(3):32-35.
[6] 李沛良. 社会研究的统计应用[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2002.
[7] 郑智慧,姜小鹰,陈艳清.AIDS临床护理服务质量标准指标体系的初步构建[J].中华护理杂志,2013,48(1):66-70.
[8] 赵晖,王筠,王大伟,等.基于亚健康证-症对应专家问卷调查的证候指标体系筛选[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2016,22(23):192-196.
[9] 李海明,王有强.卫生资源投入与健康中国建设:基于价值的卫生系统视角[J].中国行政管理,2018,(8):65-69.
[10] 仇蕾洁,张雪文,马桂峰,等.基于供给侧视角的基层医疗机构卫生人力资源短缺问题研究[J].中国卫生事业管理,2018,35(11):804-808,838.
[11] 祝嫦娥,陈昭蓉,周丹丹,等.基层卫生人才队伍建设路径探索[J].医学与社会,2019,32(9):24-27,51.
[12] 赵剑波,史丹,邓洲.高质量发展的内涵研究[J].经济与管理研究,2019,40(11):15-31.
[13] 张晋. 以新旧动能转换推进卫生健康事业高质量发展[J].政策,2018,(7):54-56.
[14] 张玉平. 全面推动卫生健康事业高质量发展[J].纳税,2020,14(1):295.
[15] 李少冬. 医疗事业必须坚持以人民健康为中心[J].唯实,2019,(2):17-20.

基金

江苏省社会科学基金项目-江苏卫生健康事业高质量发展的评价指标体系构建研究(19GLD011)
PDF(4698 KB)

2684

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/